3,000-Graft FUE Hair Transplant: Norwood 4 Hairline & Forelock Restoration

Case Study · 3,000 Grafts

A documented 3,000-graft Vitruvian FUE™ hair transplant for a patient with Norwood 4 hair loss and Alvi Armani Pattern 1 Class 5. The procedure treated Zone 1 and Zone 2, restoring the hairline and temples while adding grafts through the central mid-frontal forelock. The result shown here is documented at one year.

3,000 Grafts · Vitruvian FUE™ · Norwood 4 · Hairline, Temples & Frontal Forelock
Graft Count 3,000
Classification Norwood 4
AA Pattern Pattern 1 Class 5
Treatment Zones 1 & 2
Procedure Vitruvian FUE™
Follow-Up 1 Year
Documented Patient Result Before → 1 Year
See the Result

3,000 Grafts Across the Hairline and Frontal Forelock

This case shows a frontal restoration in which the 3,000-graft allocation was used across the hairline, temples and central forelock rather than being confined to the leading edge of the hairline alone.

The before-and-after comparison documents the patient's starting Norwood 4 pattern and the appearance of the treated frontal region one year after surgery.

Before and one-year result after 3,000-graft FUE hair transplant for Norwood 4 hair loss
Before and one year after a 3,000-graft Vitruvian FUE restoration of the frontal region.
Starting Point

Norwood 4 Frontal Hair Loss

The patient presented with advanced frontal hair loss classified as Norwood 4 and Pattern 1 Class 5 on the Alvi Armani Hair Loss Scale.

The documented treatment area included Zone 1, encompassing the hairline and temporal region, together with Zone 2 and the mid-frontal forelock.

Explore More Norwood 4 Hair Transplant Results →
Understand the Plan

Reconstruct the Hairline While Reinforcing the Central Forelock

The procedure used 3,000 FUE grafts across Zones 1 and 2. The treatment included restoration of the hairline and temples together with graft placement through the central mid-frontal forelock.

This distribution is important when comparing this patient with other cases using a similar graft count. Here, the treatment strategy included both frontal framing and the existing central forelock region.

Zone 1: Hairline & Temples

Part of the graft allocation was used to reconstruct the frontal hairline and address the temporal recession documented before surgery.

Zone 2: Mid-Frontal Forelock

The treatment also extended through the central mid-frontal forelock, connecting the frontal restoration with the patient's existing hair farther behind the hairline.

Learn About Alvi Armani Vitruvian Design™ →
Treatment Evidence

Before, Postoperative Design and One-Year Result

The available case photography includes the preoperative appearance, the immediate postoperative recipient area and the later result.

The postoperative view provides useful context for the documented Zones 1 and 2 treatment pattern and how the frontal restoration was distributed.

Before postoperative and after views of a 3,000-graft Vitruvian FUE hair transplant
Preoperative, postoperative and later result views documenting the 3,000-graft frontal restoration.
1-Year Follow-Up

Hairline and Forelock at One Year

At one year, the available photographs provide frontal and angled views of the treated hairline, temples and central frontal region.

These views are useful for evaluating the relationship between the reconstructed frontal frame and the forelock treatment behind it.

One-year frontal and angled views after 3,000-graft FUE hairline and forelock restoration
One-year views of the treated hairline, temporal region and frontal forelock.
Learn How to Evaluate Hair Transplant Results →
3,000 Hairline +
frontal forelock.
What This Case Shows

Forelock Restoration Changes How 3,000 Grafts Are Distributed

This case provides a useful comparison within the 3,000-graft range because the treatment extended beyond the frontal hairline into the mid-frontal forelock.

Other 3,000-graft cases may devote more of the graft supply to the temples, distribute grafts through a wider frontal and mid-scalp region, or represent one stage of a larger restoration.

The graft total therefore does not define the treatment plan by itself. Recipient-area size, existing native hair and the specific areas being prioritized all affect how a graft count is used.

This case does not establish a universal graft requirement for Norwood 4 hair loss. Another patient with the same classification may require a different graft count or treatment strategy.

Explore More 3,000-Graft Hair Transplant Results →
Case Questions

Understanding This 3,000-Graft Norwood 4 Case

How many grafts were transplanted?

The documented procedure used 3,000 FUE grafts.

What was the patient's hair-loss classification?

The patient was documented as Norwood 4 and Alvi Armani Pattern 1 Class 5.

Which areas were treated?

The documented treatment included Zones 1 and 2, encompassing the hairline, temporal region and mid-frontal forelock.

What is the frontal forelock?

In this case, the forelock refers to the central frontal hair-bearing area behind the leading hairline. The 3,000-graft procedure included treatment through this central region as part of the broader frontal restoration.

When were the result photographs taken?

The documented result shown on this page is from approximately one year after surgery.

Does every Norwood 4 patient need 3,000 grafts?

No. Norwood classification alone does not determine graft requirements. Treatment-area size, donor resources, existing native hair and the individual restoration plan all affect the appropriate graft count.

Continue Exploring

Explore More Hair Restoration Evidence

Personalized FUE Hair Transplantation Planning

Your FUE Hair Transplantation Plan Is Individual

Graft count is only one part of planning. Your hair-loss pattern, treatment areas, existing native hair, donor resources and long-term goals all influence the appropriate approach.