3,600-Graft Vitruvian FUE: Pattern 2 Class 5 Frontal Restoration

Case Study · 3,600 Grafts

A documented 3,600-graft Vitruvian FUE restoration for an AlviArmani Pattern 2 Class 5 patient. The surgical plan focused the majority of the graft supply across Zones 1 and 2, transitioned into anterior Zone 3, and used limited posterior placement in Zone 4.

Vitruvian FUE · 3,600 Grafts · Pattern 2 Class 5 · Zones 1–2 Focus · Zone 3 Transition · Limited Zone 4 Placement
Graft Count 3,600
Classification Pattern 2 Class 5
Primary Focus Zones 1 & 2
Transition Anterior Zone 3
Posterior Placement Limited Zone 4
Procedure Vitruvian FUE
Documented Patient Result Before → Result
See the Result

Frontal Framing After a 3,600-Graft Vitruvian FUE Restoration

The available before-and-result photography documents the frontal restoration following the 3,600-graft procedure, including the relationship between the reconstructed frontal frame and the patient's existing facial proportions.

The exact postoperative interval for the result photography is not documented in the available case record.

Before and result views following 3,600-graft Vitruvian FUE frontal restoration
Before-and-result views documenting frontal and lateral framing following the 3,600-graft Vitruvian FUE procedure. The exact follow-up interval is not documented.
Starting Point

Pattern 2 Class 5 With an Anterior Restoration Priority

The patient was documented as AlviArmani Pattern 2 Class 5. The operative plan prioritized the anterior restoration, with Zones 1 and 2 receiving the primary focus.

Treatment did not stop abruptly behind the frontal zones. The documented strategy incorporated a transition into anterior Zone 3 together with limited placement farther posteriorly in Zone 4.

Understand the Plan

Concentrating the Graft Supply Anteriorly

The 3,600-graft Vitruvian FUE procedure was designed around a clear anterior priority. Zones 1 and 2 formed the principal recipient area, followed by a transition into anterior Zone 3.

The posterior component was intentionally limited rather than treated with the same concentration as the frontal scalp.

Zones 1 & 2 Priority

The majority of the available graft supply was directed toward the anterior restoration, where the hairline and frontal architecture were the principal surgical priorities.

Transition & Posterior Placement

Treatment transitioned into anterior Zone 3, while only limited graft placement was documented farther posteriorly in Zone 4.

Allocation evidence: the case's posterior-planning graphic states that approximately 95% of the available grafts were leveraged anteriorly, with only a small number of grafts placed posteriorly. The record does not provide exact graft counts for each individual zone.
Learn About Vitruvian FUE →
Graft Composition

83% Double- and Triple-Hair Follicular Units

The case record documents that 83% of the grafts were double- or triple-hair follicular units, while single-hair grafts were used at the hairline edge.

The available documentation provides this percentage composition but does not supply separate exact counts of singles, doubles and triples.

Evidence note: graft composition is reported here exactly as documented. No additional follicular-unit counts are inferred from the percentage information.
Operative Evidence

Before Surgery and Immediately After Recipient-Site Placement

The operative photography provides a direct comparison between the patient's starting point and the immediate postoperative recipient area.

Before and immediate postoperative views following 3,600-graft Vitruvian FUE frontal restoration
Before and immediate postoperative evidence documenting the frontal recipient area following the 3,600-graft procedure.
Posterior planning evidence showing limited Zone 4 graft placement during 3,600-graft Vitruvian FUE
Posterior planning evidence documenting the limited posterior component of the restoration. The case graphic states that approximately 95% of available grafts were used anteriorly, with only a small number placed posteriorly.
Follow-Up Result

Frontal and Mid-Scalp Evidence After Treatment

Additional result views document the appearance of the frontal restoration and the transition farther into the scalp.

Because the current case record does not provide an exact follow-up interval, these photographs should not be assigned a specific month or described as a mature or final result.

Before and result evidence after 3,600-graft Vitruvian FUE frontal restoration
Additional before-and-result view documenting the frontal restoration. Exact follow-up timing is unavailable.
Mid-scalp transition evidence after 3,600-graft Vitruvian FUE restoration
Additional evidence of the transition behind the primary frontal treatment area.
Photography note: the result images document several viewing angles, but the exact postoperative interval is not available in the current case record. They are therefore presented as documented follow-up evidence without assigning unsupported timing or finality.
Learn How to Evaluate Hair Transplant Results →
3,600 Anterior
Priority
What This Case Shows

A 3,600-Graft Plan Does Not Require Uniform Coverage Across Every Zone

This case is particularly useful because the operative strategy is documented more precisely than graft count alone.

The procedure emphasized Zones 1 and 2, transitioned into anterior Zone 3, and used only limited graft placement posteriorly in Zone 4. The case documentation states that approximately 95% of the available grafts were directed anteriorly.

That creates a different planning example from another procedure in the same graft-count range where the graft supply might be distributed more evenly across several recipient regions.

This does not mean every Pattern 2 Class 5 patient requires 3,600 grafts or the same distribution. Appropriate graft requirements depend on recipient-area size, donor resources, existing native hair, hair characteristics and the goals of the individual restoration.

Explore More 3,500-Graft Hair Transplant Results →
Case Questions

Understanding This 3,600-Graft Vitruvian FUE Case

How many grafts were used?

The documented procedure used 3,600 FUE grafts.

What was the patient's documented classification?

The patient was documented as AlviArmani Pattern 2 Class 5. A Norwood classification is not documented in the current case record.

Which areas received the greatest treatment focus?

Zones 1 and 2 were the primary treatment focus. The plan then transitioned into anterior Zone 3, with limited posterior graft placement in Zone 4.

How much of the graft supply was used anteriorly?

The available case graphic states that approximately 95% of the available grafts were leveraged anteriorly. Exact graft counts by individual zone are not documented.

What types of follicular units were used?

The case documentation states that 83% of the grafts were double- or triple-hair follicular units, with singles used at the hairline edge. Exact counts for each graft type are not provided.

Was Zone 4 treated?

Yes, but the case documents only limited posterior placement in Zone 4 rather than the same concentration used in the anterior treatment zones.

How long after surgery were the result photographs taken?

The exact follow-up interval is not documented in the available case record.

Does every Pattern 2 Class 5 patient need 3,600 grafts?

No. Graft requirements vary according to recipient-area size, donor resources, existing native hair, hair characteristics and the goals of the individual restoration.

Continue Exploring

Learn More About the Team, Locations and Patient Results

The treating provider and procedure location are not documented in the available case record. Explore the AlviArmani team and locations, compare additional results, or begin an individualized evaluation of your own restoration goals.

Personalized Hair Restoration Planning

Your Hair Restoration Plan Is Individual

Graft count is only one part of planning. Your hair-loss pattern, treatment areas, existing native hair, donor resources and long-term goals all influence the appropriate approach.