FUE Hairline Lowering: 3,433-Graft Before & After

FUE Hairline Lowering · 3,433 Grafts

A patient in his mid-to-late 50s presented with severe temple recession and frontal thinning. His documented treatment used 3,433 FUE grafts to lower, redesign and restore the hairline and temples, with PRP and exosomes recorded as adjunct treatments.

3,433 Grafts · FUE · Norwood 3 · Hairline + Temples · 9-Month Result
Graft Count 3,433
Procedure FUE
Classification Norwood 3
Treatment Area Hairline + Temples
Follow-Up 9 Months
Patient Age Mid-to-Late 50s
Documented Patient Result Before → Post-Op → Follow-Up
See the Result

FUE Hairline Lowering Before and After

This case documents the patient's starting hairline, immediate postoperative graft placement and subsequent result following a 3,433-graft FUE procedure.

The treatment focused on lowering and redesigning the frontal hairline while restoring recession through the temple regions.

Before, postoperative and after views of 3,433-graft FUE hairline lowering and temple restoration
Before, immediate postoperative and follow-up views documenting the hairline-lowering procedure and restored frontal frame.
Photography note: The photographs were taken under different conditions, with differences in lighting, background, hair length and styling. They should therefore be interpreted as documented patient evidence rather than standardized clinical photography.
Starting Point

Norwood 3 Hair Loss With Frontal Thinning and Temple Recession

The patient was documented as having Norwood Class 3 hair loss, with severe recession through the temple regions and thinning across the frontal scalp.

His treatment plan focused on lowering and redesigning the frontal hairline while restoring the recessed temples.

Before and postoperative views showing Norwood 3 frontal and temple recession and graft placement after FUE hairline lowering
Preoperative views document the frontal and temporal recession. The postoperative view shows graft placement across the redesigned frontal hairline and temple region.
Explore More Norwood 3 Hair Transplant Results →
Surgical Plan

3,433 FUE Grafts for Hairline Lowering and Temple Restoration

The documented procedure used 3,433 FUE grafts to lower, redesign and restore the patient's hairline and temples.

PRP and exosomes were also documented as adjunct treatments in this case. Because the available record does not isolate their effect from the hair transplant itself, no independent growth or timing benefit is attributed to either adjunct.

Hairline Lowering

The surgical plan lowered and redesigned the frontal hairline as part of the restoration.

Temple Restoration

Grafts were also used to address the patient's documented temporal recession and rebuild the frontal frame.

Case-record note: The supplied record does not document the treating physician, clinic location, procedure date, exact graft allocation by recipient zone or donor characteristics. Those details are therefore not inferred.
Learn About FUE Hair Transplantation →
Follow-Up Result

Hairline and Temple Result at 9 Months

The documented follow-up result was photographed at approximately 9 months after the procedure. These additional views show the restored frontal hairline and temple regions from several angles.

Nine-month result after 3,433-graft FUE hairline lowering and temple restoration
Follow-up views at approximately 9 months after the documented 3,433-graft FUE procedure.
Compare the Change

Frontal Before-and-After Comparison

A frontal comparison provides another view of the change in the patient's hairline position and frontal framing following the procedure.

Frontal before and after comparison following 3,433 FUE grafts for hairline lowering
Frontal before-and-after comparison following the 3,433-graft FUE restoration.
Learn How to Evaluate Hair Transplant Results →
Patient Video

Watch the 3,433-Graft Hairline-Lowering Case

The case also includes video documentation of the patient's hair restoration result.

3,433 grafts
frontal focus
What This Case Shows

A 3,433-Graft Plan Focused on the Frontal Frame

This patient provides a documented example of a graft count in the 3,500-graft range being used primarily to lower and reconstruct the hairline and restore the temples.

The graft total should not be interpreted as a standard requirement for hairline lowering or for every Norwood 3 patient. Appropriate graft planning depends on the patient's starting pattern, recipient area, donor resources, existing native hair, hair characteristics and restoration goals.

Compare 3,500-Graft Hair Transplant Results →
Case Questions

Understanding This FUE Hairline-Lowering Case

How many grafts were used?

The documented procedure used 3,433 FUE grafts.

What areas were treated?

The procedure lowered and redesigned the frontal hairline and restored the patient's recessed temples.

What was the patient's hair-loss classification?

The patient was documented as having Norwood Class 3 hair loss with severe temple recession and frontal thinning.

When were the result photographs taken?

The case documents a result at approximately 9 months after the procedure.

Were PRP and exosomes used?

Yes. PRP and exosomes are documented as adjunct treatments in this case. The available evidence does not isolate their contribution from the FUE procedure, so a specific effect on growth speed or outcome is not assigned to either treatment.

Does hairline lowering always require about 3,400 grafts?

No. Graft requirements depend on the amount of hairline movement, the size of the recipient area, temple involvement, existing native hair, donor resources, hair characteristics and the goals of the individual restoration.

Continue Exploring

Learn More About the Team and Patient Results

Explore AlviArmani providers and clinic locations, compare additional patient evidence or begin a personalized evaluation of your hairline and restoration goals.

Personalized Hair Restoration Planning

Your Hair Restoration Plan Is Individual

Graft count is only one part of planning. Your hair-loss pattern, treatment areas, existing native hair, donor resources and long-term goals all influence the appropriate approach.